Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

Scan to solve math questions

QUESTION IMAGE

4. identifying argument forms section a. for each of the following argu…

Question

  1. identifying argument forms

section a. for each of the following arguments, identify the form of the argument

  1. if socrates is a human, then socrates is mortal. socrates is a human. so, socrates is mortal.
  2. if socrates is a cow, then socrates gives milk. socrates is a cow. so, socrates gives milk.
  3. if socrates is a cow, then socrates has four legs. socrates has four legs. so, socrates is a cow.
  4. if socrates is a human, then hes a mammal. socrates is not a human. so, socrates is not a mammal.
  5. if socrates is a horse, then hes warm - blooded. socrates is not warm - blooded. so, socrates is not a horse.
  6. if socrates was a philosopher then he wasnt a historian. socrates wasnt a historian. so, socrates was a philosopher.

section b. place the following arguments in standard form. identify the form and whether or not it is valid or invalid. if it is invalid, explain why.

  1. if the color of the hat on his own head does not cause the one - eyed prisoner to go blind, then the prison yard will be unoccupied during the bowl game. the color of the hat on his own head does not cause the one - eyed prisoner to go blind. therefore, the prison yard will be empty during the game.
  2. you will not contribute to the spread of the virus only if you follow the public health guidelines. thus, you are not a spreader since you clearly cooperate with the public health measures.
  3. if number were an idea, then arithmetic would be psychology. but arithmetic is no more psychology than, say, astronomy is. astronomy is concerned, not with ideas of the planets, but with the planets themselves, and by the same token, the objects of arithmetic are not ideas either. --gottlob frege, the foundations of arithmetic
  4. if you dont pay your taxes, youll be sent to federal prison. but dont worry. you paid your taxes, so you wont be sent to federal prison.

Explanation:

Response

Section A:

Brief Explanations

Each argument is matched to its logical form, defined by standard deductive argument structures.

Brief Explanations

Arguments are restated in standard premise-conclusion form, identified by their logical structure, and evaluated for validity (valid forms preserve truth; invalid forms allow true premises and false conclusion).

Answer:

  1. Modus Ponens (Affirming the Antecedent)
  2. Modus Ponens (Affirming the Antecedent)
  3. Affirming the Consequent
  4. Denying the Antecedent
  5. Modus Tollens (Denying the Consequent)
  6. Affirming the Consequent

---

Section B: