Question

part b
select all of the arguments anti - federalists used to support the position you selected in part a.
a separation of powers between branches of government can provide a check against tyranny.
state governments are poorly equipped to handle issues related to economics and taxation.
individual rights cannot be guaranteed unless there are legal limits in place.
strong state governments will threaten the power of the national government.
a strong national government may become corrupt and abuse its power.

Explanation:

The Anti - Federalists were concerned about a strong national government potentially overstepping and infringing on individual rights. They believed in the need for legal limits to safeguard individual liberties and were wary of a powerful central government that could become corrupt. The idea of separation of powers was more of a Federalist argument for checks and balances, and they generally favored strong state governments over the view that states were ill - equipped to handle economic and tax issues. Also, they did not see strong state governments as a threat to the national government but rather as a counter - balance.

Answer:

C. Individual rights cannot be guaranteed unless there are legal limits in place.
E. A strong national government may become corrupt and abuse its power.