Question

the population of a certain endangered species in a national park has decreased. a group of scientists is thinking about cloning in order to increase the population. the scientists are considering the ethical aspects of cloning. which statement is a scientifically valid argument raised by cloning an endangered species? a. the cloned animals would be unable to reproduce. b. the cloned animals would be healthier than the donor animals. c. cloning fails to increase the genetic diversity of the population. d. cloning should be used to ensure the survival of endangered species.

Explanation:

Cloning involves creating genetically - identical organisms. This means that new genetic variation is not introduced, which is crucial for a population's long - term survival and adaptability. Cloned animals can reproduce (A is false), there's no guarantee they are healthier (B is false), and D is a value - laden statement, not a scientific argument.

Answer:

C. Cloning fails to increase the genetic diversity of the population.