Question

read colin’s argument.
nowadays, one often hears complaints that drones can invade people’s privacy. but this is not true. flying drones is actually a sport. it requires coordination and technical skills like other sports. in fact, there should be professional drone - flying leagues. if people recognized this sport, they would no longer complain about where and when drone owners flew their drones.
is colin’s evidence relevant to his claim?
○ yes, because he gives evidence that flying drones is a sport.
○ yes, because it is on the subject of people owning and flying drones.
○ no, because he only gives his own opinion rather than providing evidence.
○ no, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.

Explanation:

Colin's claim is about whether drones invade privacy (he says they don't). His evidence is about flying drones being a sport. The question is if the evidence is relevant to the claim. The evidence focuses on drones as a sport, not on privacy issues, so it's not relevant. Option D explains this: it's about drones as a sport, not privacy.

Answer:

D. No, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.