Question

read the scenario. joe, a reporter for main street news, covered a campaign rally for jiya patel, who is running for county commissioner. while at the rally, he interviewed the candidate and some audience members as his research for the article. he then wrote an article describing the rally, the candidates platform, and the reasons her supporters believe that she is the best person for this job. when he finished, he turned his article in to his editor. as the editor reviews this story, he sees a public report on campaign donations and learns that joe has made a sizeable contribution to patels campaign. what is the most ethical action for the editor to take? edit the article that was written to make sure it is objective, then run it in tomorrows edition of the newspaper explain to the reporter that the newspaper cannot run the story because of perceived bias based on donations, so the article is being reassigned discuss the article with the reporter to better understand his affiliation with the candidate and his views on the upcoming local elections ask a reporter who supports an opposing candidate to read and help edit the article to ensure there is no bias in the reporting

Explanation:

Journalistic ethics require objectivity. A reporter who has donated to a candidate has a conflict - of - interest. Reassigning the article avoids the appearance of bias. Editing the article by the original editor may not fully remove the bias. Discussing with the reporter may not resolve the conflict - of - interest. Asking a reporter with a bias in the opposite direction is also not an ethical solution as it can introduce another form of bias.

Answer:

explain to the reporter that the newspaper cannot run the story because of perceived bias based on donations, so the article is being reassigned