Question

shows us that we can group related species by the similarity of genes present in their genomes

1. how are scientists like crime solvers?
2. which is an evidence for evolution not

they can both figure out what happened, given enough clues
they both use dna
they both require advanced degrees
they both get paid very poorly

Explanation:

1. Scientists and crime solvers both analyze available clues (like genetic data or forensic evidence) to reconstruct past events.
2. The question about evidence against evolution is based on a false premise; evolution is a well-supported scientific theory with overwhelming evidence from genetics, fossil records, and comparative anatomy. There is no valid scientific evidence that disproves evolution.

Answer:

1. They can both figure out what happened, given enough clues
2. There is no valid scientific evidence against evolution; the premise of this question is incorrect as evolution is a robustly supported scientific theory.