Question

use two of the pieces below to build a strong opposing argument.
thesis
leftover food from hot meals should always be reheated before eating.
opposing argument
your answer
skeptics protest that
sentence menu - drag up two of the segments.
leftover food never tastes good after being reheated. they believe that heating any food more than once will make it taste terrible and eating food cold is always preferable.
some leftover food tastes better cold even if its normally eaten hot. they argue that reheating can make many foods, like pizza or burritos, soggy and unpleasant.

Explanation:

To build a strong opposing argument, select two segments that directly counter the thesis by providing specific, reasonable reasons why reheating leftover hot meals is not always necessary. The chosen segments offer distinct, evidence-based (food-specific) and preference-based critiques of mandatory reheating.

Answer:

Skeptics protest that some leftover food tastes better cold even if it's normally eaten hot. They argue that reheating can make many foods, like pizza or burritos, soggy and unpleasant. They also protest that leftover food never tastes good after being reheated. They believe that heating any food more than once will make it taste terrible and eating food cold is always preferable.