Question

which additional piece of evidence from the article helps to create the most complete argument that there are several approaches the state of minnesota can take to protect its moose population?
a “unless we want to wait 60,000 years until moose get the parasite relationship figured out.”
b biologists say there are solutions, but at this point few are workable.
c and within the deer permit area around grand marais and up to canada, current hunting rules are designed to increase deer numbers slightly.
d because tamping down on the number of snails, she said, would be a much easier sell than getting rid of the deer.

Explanation:

Option D presents a specific approach (controlling snail numbers) that Minnesota can take to protect moose population. Option A only mentions waiting for moose - parasite relationship to be figured out, not an approach. Option B just states there are solutions but few are workable without specifying any. Option C is about deer - hunting rules and not directly related to moose protection approaches.

Answer:

D. Because tamping down on the number of snails, she said, would be a much easier sell than getting rid of the deer.