Question

1. why does the author likely include the section entitled \changing russia\?

a. to prove that nicholas ii was actually a good leader but that his rule was marred by tragedies out of his control
b. to acknowledge that progress was being made in russia under nicholas ii but that the rate of change was too slow
c. to point out that the progress made under nicholas ii contributed to the revolution, for more people were being educated and began demanding change
d. to note that the changing structure of the cities (i.e. increased population) made it easier for riots to break out and eventually violent revolution

Explanation:

To determine the author's purpose for including the "Changing Russia" section, we analyze each option:

• Option A: Nicholas II's leadership is not typically viewed as "good" overall, and the focus of such a section is unlikely to be proving this, so A is incorrect.
• Option B: While progress might have been slow, the key connection to the revolution (a common theme in Russian history around Nicholas II) is missing. So B is less likely.
• Option C: Under Nicholas II, education expanded, leading to more people demanding change, which contributed to the revolution. This ties the "changing" aspects (like education) to the revolutionary cause, making it a strong reason for including the section.
• Option D: The structure of cities (population increase) is a minor factor compared to the broader social and political changes (like education - driven demands) in causing the revolution. So D is not the main reason.

Answer:

C. To point out that the progress made under Nicholas II contributed to the revolution, for more people were being educated and began demanding change