Question

drag each component of an argument to the statements that fit those components. claim reasoning rebuttal evidence atoms cannot be created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction. balanced equations always begin and end with the same number of each element the periodic table of elements confirms that starting and ending with the same number of atoms will also start and end with the same total mass. when paper is burnt in a chemical reaction it loses mass, so it’s not conserved

Explanation:

A claim is a statement of what is believed to be true. "Atoms cannot be created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction" is a claim as it presents a fundamental idea in chemistry. Reasoning is the explanation of why the evidence supports the claim. "Balanced equations always begin and end with the same number of each element" and "The periodic table of elements confirms that starting and ending with the same number of atoms will also start and end with the same total mass" are reasoning as they explain the concept of mass - conservation in chemical reactions. A rebuttal is a counter - argument. "When paper is burnt in a chemical reaction it loses mass, so it's not conserved" is a rebuttal as it goes against the idea of mass conservation. Evidence is data or facts that support the claim. There is no pure evidence among these statements in a strict sense as they are more theoretical statements rather than empirical data.

Answer:

claim: Atoms cannot be created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction.
reasoning: Balanced equations always begin and end with the same number of each element; The periodic table of elements confirms that starting and ending with the same number of atoms will also start and end with the same total mass.
rebuttal: When paper is burnt in a chemical reaction it loses mass, so it's not conserved.
evidence: None of the given statements are pure evidence in a strict sense.