Question

of the document? it is a historical written account written account from may 1892. reliability significant aspects close reading 1. write down all the words or phrases that seem particularly strong. abolish means open declaration of war. slaughter means make the co suggesting extreme behavior 2. do these words make one side seem “right” or “wrong”? how do you know? 3. whose perspective is missing from this document? document b: henry frick sourcing 1. what kind of document is this? whose idea does it contain? what is his perspec source: emma goldman was political activist and radical who fervently supported workers rights. the documents reaction comes from her memories of the events.

Explanation:

1. For the first close - reading question, words like "abolish" and "slaughter" are strong as they connote extreme actions. "Abolish" implies a forceful end and "slaughter" implies a violent act.
2. These words make the side that uses such extreme actions seem "wrong" as they suggest aggression and violence. For example, "abolish" in the context of labor relations is like a declaration of war, and "slaughter" implies an inhumane act.
3. The perspective of the Pinkerton agents themselves is missing. We only hear about their actions from the workers' and the author's view, not their own reasoning or feelings.

For Document B sourcing: It is a historical account likely containing the ideas of Henry Frick. His perspective is that of a management figure who is anti - union, as he is known for his hatred of unions and his actions against the workers.

Answer:

1. Words like "abolish", "slaughter" are particularly strong.
2. The side using these words seems "wrong" due to the extreme and violent connotations.
3. The perspective of the Pinkerton agents is missing.

For Document B: It is a historical account containing Henry Frick's ideas. His perspective is anti - union.