Question

how has supreme court precedent changed your fifth amendment rights over time? check all that apply. officers can pressure a person to confess to a crime. officers must communicate a persons rights to before questioning the person in custody. officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk. officers can communicate a persons rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning. officers may create different sets of rules to apply to groups of citizens however they please.

Explanation:

The Fifth Amendment includes the right against self - incrimination. Supreme Court precedents like Miranda v. Arizona require officers to communicate a person's rights (Miranda rights) before questioning in custody. Also, in cases where public safety is at risk, officers can question immediately. Officers must communicate rights accurately and cannot create arbitrary rules for different citizen groups. Pressuring a person to confess violates the right against self - incrimination.

Answer:

Officers must communicate a person's rights to before questioning the person in custody.
Officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk.
Officers can communicate a person's rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning.