Question

the interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. a constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. it therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. -alexander hamilton, federalist no. 78 which statement comes closest to summarizing the meaning of this passage? courts should not try to interpret the laws. courts should interpret laws and the constitution. courts should follow the laws but not the constitution itself. courts should follow the laws of the legislature.

Explanation:

The passage states that interpretation of laws is the courts' role and that judges should regard the constitution as fundamental law and ascertain its meaning along with laws from the legislature.

Answer:

Courts should interpret laws and the Constitution.