Question

read the excerpt from monster. petrocelli then he must have lied, is that right? obrien objection. the prosecution is soliciting an argument. petrocelli withdrawn. mr. harmon, you say you werent at the drugstore anytime during the day of the robbery. perhaps you would tell us where you were. based on this dialogue, what can the reader infer? this is petrocellis first time acting as the prosecuting attorney in a court of law. mr. harmon knows where he was during the day of the robbery. it is a rule of the court that a lawyer may not argue with someone during questioning. petrocelli has not been a trial lawyer as long as obrien has.

Explanation:

Petrocelli asks Mr. Harmon where he was during the day of the robbery after Mr. Harmon said he wasn't at the drugstore. This implies Mr. Harmon knows his whereabouts on that day. There is no evidence in the dialogue about it being Petrocelli's first - time as a prosecutor, no mention of a rule about not arguing during questioning, and no comparison of how long Petrocelli and O'Brien have been trial lawyers.

Answer:

Mr. Harmon knows where he was during the day of the robbery.