Question

read the passage. the debate over whether online friendships can rival in - person relationships reflects the evolving nature of human connection. advocates for online friendships point to their inclusivity, allowing people to bond across geographic, cultural, and economic barriers. a 2021 pew research study revealed that fifty - seven percent of teens reported forming strong friendships online, citing shared interests as a key factor. people can socialize and connect with people they feel close to, regardless of location. critics argue that virtual relationships lack the depth of face - to - face interactions, which provide nonverbal cues and shared experiences that deepen bonds. while its true that physical presence can foster intimacy, dismissing online connections overlooks their unique strengths. digital platforms empower individuals who feel isolated or marginalized to find communities of support. the quality of a friendship should not be measured by physical proximity but by the mutual trust, understanding, and growth it brings. which statement best summarizes the author’s point of view about online friendships compared to in - person friendships? online friendships are shallow and cannot provide the same depth as in - person friendships because of their lack of face - to - face interactions. studies have shown that teenagers have a higher success rate than adults in finding lasting friendships online. while in - person friendships have unique benefits, online friendships can be equally meaningful. friendships formed online are superior to those formed in - person because they are based on shared interests.

Explanation:

The passage acknowledges in - person benefits but also highlights online strengths like inclusivity and support for isolated people.

Answer:

While in - person friendships have unique benefits, online friendships can be equally meaningful.