Question

which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be changed to 18? changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents. some 16 - year - olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them. some 16 - year - olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone. changing the minimum driving age to 18 shouldnt cause too much of a problem, because its only two years older than 16.

Explanation:

The first claim links the age - change to a clear benefit (safer roads) by highlighting the higher accident - rate of less - experienced drivers. The second claim is against the change, the third is inconsistent in its stance, and the fourth is a weak argument about the age difference.

Answer:

Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.