Question

which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be changed to 18? changing the minimum driving age to 18 shouldnt cause too much of a problem, because its only two years older than 16. some 16 - year - olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them. some 16 - year - olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone. changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.

Explanation:

The claim that changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone as less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents directly supports the argument that the minimum age to get a driver's license should be 18. The first option just mentions the age difference, the second option presents a counter - argument about 16 - year - olds' responsibilities, and the third option is too vague about the overall benefit.

Answer:

Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.