Question

which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan delucas argument in dylans nobel prize settles debate: rock lyrics are poetry?
overall, delucas wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.
i find the examples of internal rhyme to be the most convincing evidence deluca offers.
deluca calls on novelists and a us president for their opinions of the nobel committees decision.

Explanation:

A concluding statement for an argument evaluation should summarize the overall strength and core claim of the author's argument. The first option ties together DeLuca's evidence to validate his central claim that rock lyrics are poetry, which serves as a proper evaluative conclusion. The second option only focuses on one specific piece of evidence, not a full conclusion. The third option merely restates a detail of his argument, not an evaluative wrap-up.

Answer:

Overall, DeLuca's wide-ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.