Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

Scan to solve math questions

QUESTION IMAGE

a partial proof was constructed given that mnop is a parallelogram. by …

Question

a partial proof was constructed given that mnop is a parallelogram. by the definition of a parallelogram, \\(\overline{mn} \parallel \overline{po}\\) and \\(\overline{mp} \parallel \overline{no}\\). using \\(\overline{mp}\\) as a transversal, \\(\angle m\\) and \\(\angle p\\) are same - side interior angles, so they are supplementary. using \\(\overline{no}\\) as a transversal, \\(\angle n\\) and \\(\angle o\\) are same - side interior angles, so they are supplementary. using \\(\overline{op}\\) as a transversal, \\(\angle o\\) and \\(\angle p\\) are same - side interior angles, so they are supplementary. therefore, \\(\underline{quadquad}\\) because they are supplements of the same angle. which statement should fill in the blank in the last line of the proof? \\(\bigcirc\\) \\(\angle m\\) is supplementary to \\(\angle o\\) \\(\bigcirc\\) \\(\angle n\\) is supplementary to \\(\angle p\\) \\(\bigcirc\\) \\(\angle m \cong \angle p\\) \\(\bigcirc\\) \\(\angle n \cong \angle p\\)

Explanation:

Brief Explanations

We start with the given that MNOP is a parallelogram. From the proof steps:

  1. $\angle M$ and $\angle P$ are supplementary.
  2. $\angle O$ and $\angle P$ are supplementary.

This means $\angle M$ and $\angle O$ are both supplements of $\angle P$. By the theorem that supplements of the same angle are congruent, we can identify the correct statement.

  • $\angle M$ supplementary to $\angle O$: This is not supported, as they share the same supplement $\angle P$, so they are congruent, not supplementary.
  • $\angle N$ supplementary to $\angle P$: This is not established in the given proof steps.
  • $\angle M \cong \angle P$: This is false, as they are stated to be supplementary.
  • $\angle M \cong \angle O$: This fits, since both are supplements of $\angle P$.

Answer:

$\boldsymbol{\angle M \cong \angle O}$ (Note: This corresponds to the logical conclusion matching the "supplements of the same angle" rule; if forced to map to the options provided, the intended correct congruence statement is $\angle M \cong \angle O$, which aligns with the proof's final reasoning.)