Question

according to botanists, who study and classify plants, a fruit is the part of a plant that contains seeds. by this definition, not only melons and plums but zucchinis, green beans, and tomatoes are all fruits. in fact, based on this definition, any vegetable with seeds could be classified as a fruit. in contrast, nutritionists, who study diet, reserve the term \fruit\ only for sweet, fleshy fruits, using \vegetable\ for those that are low in fructose, or fruit sugar. vegetables are usually eaten as part of a meal, while fruits are often eaten as a snack or dessert. nutritionists argue that although tomatoes may be fruits from a botanical perspective, they arent eaten the way typical fruits are, so theyre vegetables. depending on who you ask, a tomato can be considered a fruit, a vegetable, or both. what is the main, or central, idea of the passage? nutritionists consider plant parts that have seeds but are not high in fructose to be vegetables. tomatoes are scientifically classified as fruits, but they are not served the way other fruits are often served. botanists consider all plant parts with seeds to be fruits, but nutritionists consider many of them to be vegetables.

Explanation:

The passage compares botanists' and nutritionists' definitions of fruits and vegetables. Botanists define fruits as plant - parts with seeds, while nutritionists base it on fructose content and eating habits. It gives the example of tomatoes to show the difference in classification.

Answer:

Botanists consider all plant parts with seeds to be fruits, but nutritionists consider many of them to be vegetables.