Question

analyzing responses to the french rev| event | response | reasoning || ---- | ---- | ---- || the storming of the bastille | resist<br>collaborate<br>ignore | || womens march on versailles | resist<br>collaborate<br>ignore | || the flight to varennes | resist<br>collaborate<br>ignore | || the september massacres | resist<br>collaborate<br>ignore | || the executions of louis xvi & marie antoinette | resist<br>collaborate<br>ignore | || the reign of terror | resist<br>collaborate<br>ignore | |n the events that took place in the revolution and in todays world, what does it look like whe| resist | collaborate | act as if nothing happ || ---- | ---- | ---- || | | |pact can that choice have on you as an individual and on those around you?

Explanation:

Each response is selected based on the perspective of a moderate French noble/royalist sympathizer during the revolution, with reasoning tied to the event's context:

1. The Storming of the Bastille: The event was a sudden, popular uprising against royal authority. A moderate royalist would resist to protect the monarchy's power and their own status.
2. Women's March on Versailles: The march was driven by food shortages, a crisis affecting all classes. A moderate would collaborate to address the immediate need to avoid further unrest.
3. The Flight to Varennes: The royal family's escape attempt was a private, failed action. Ignoring it avoids drawing unwanted attention from revolutionary forces.
4. The September Massacres: These were violent, unregulated killings of political prisoners. Resisting would be an attempt to uphold legal order and protect innocent detainees.
5. The Executions of Louis XVI & Marie Antoinette: The executions were a formal revolutionary act with overwhelming support. Ignoring it is a survival tactic to avoid being targeted as a royalist.
6. The Reign of Terror: This was a period of state-sanctioned mass violence. Collaborating (e.g., complying with revolutionary committees) is necessary to avoid being labeled a counter-revolutionary and executed.

For the bottom section:

• Resist: Taking public action against unjust authority, e.g., protesting, organizing opposition. This can lead to individual danger (arrest, violence) but may inspire others to fight for change.
• Collaborate: Working with authorities to address grievances, e.g., negotiating reforms. This can lead to incremental progress but may draw criticism from hardline opponents.
• Act as if nothing happened (Ignore): Avoiding engagement with conflict. This protects individual safety but allows unjust systems or violence to continue unchallenged.

Answer:

Top Table (Event, Response, Reasoning)

1. The Storming of the Bastille:

• Response: Resist
• Reasoning: Defend royal authority/status

1. Women's March on Versailles:

• Response: Collaborate
• Reasoning: Address food crisis to calm unrest

1. The Flight to Varennes:

• Response: Ignore
• Reasoning: Avoid revolutionary scrutiny

1. The September Massacres:

• Response: Resist
• Reasoning: Uphold legal order, protect prisoners

1. The Executions of Louis XVI & Marie Antoinette:

• Response: Ignore
• Reasoning: Survive by avoiding royalist labeling

1. The Reign of Terror:

• Response: Collaborate
• Reasoning: Avoid being targeted as a counter-revolutionary

Bottom Table (Action, Definition, Impact)

1. Resist: Publicly opposing unjust authority (e.g., protests). Impact: Personal risk (arrest/violence), potential to inspire collective change.
2. Collaborate: Working with authorities to fix issues (e.g., negotiations). Impact: Incremental progress, criticism from hardline opponents.
3. Act as if nothing happened (Ignore): Avoiding conflict engagement. Impact: Personal safety, allows injustice to persist unchallenged.