Question

military service (argumentative)
in many countries, 18 - year - olds do not go directly from high school to college or the workplace but are instead required to spend a year in their countrys military. write an essay in which you argue for or against such a policy, using specific reasons and examples to support your position.
level 1

level 2 because
1.

2.

3.

level 3

formula: reason #1 and reason #2, therefore claim. additionally, reason #3

Explanation:

This is an outline for an argumentative essay opposing mandatory 1-year military service for 18-year-olds. Level 1 is the core claim, Level 2 lists supporting reasons, and Level 3 expands each reason with specific examples, following the given formula.

Answer:

Level 1: Mandatory 1-year military service for 18-year-olds should be abolished

Level 2 because

1. It disrupts academic and career trajectories
2. It imposes unnecessary mental health risks
3. It ignores individual aptitude and personal goals

Level 3

1. For example, a student accepted into a competitive engineering program would lose a year of progress, requiring them to catch up on coursework or delay graduation. This gap can also make it harder for them to secure internships or entry-level roles that prioritize continuous academic or professional experience, as seen in countries like South Korea where many young professionals report career setbacks due to mandatory service.
2. Studies from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs show that young adults (18-20) are 30% more likely to develop PTSD after exposure to military training and deployment than older service members. In Israel, which has mandatory service, 1 in 5 young conscripts report symptoms of anxiety or depression following their service that interfere with post-military life.
3. A young person pursuing a career in the arts or healthcare may not benefit from military training, and the year spent in service could prevent them from completing critical internships or certifications. For instance, a pre-med student would delay medical school entry, extending the time it takes to become a practicing doctor, which harms both their personal career goals and public access to healthcare providers.