Question

read the excerpt from a genetics of justice by julia alvarez. passage a: and so, long after we had left, my parents were still living in the dictatorship inside their own heads. even on american soil, they were afraid of awful consequences if they spoke out or disagreed with authorities. the first amendment right to free speech meant nothing to them. silence about anything \political\ was the rule in our house. passage b: my mother, especially, lived in terror of the consequences of living as free citizens. in new york city, before trujillo was killed, dominican exiles gathered around the young revolutionary juan bosch planning an invasion of the island. every time my father attended. which statement best analyzes how the author develops the central idea across the two passages? alvarez describes how the sims threats and activities followed her family even in the united states. alvarez shows how her parents fears about the dictatorship turned out to be false as the situation in the dominican republic improved. alvarez shows how her parents fears about the dictatorship affected their thoughts and actions even when they lived in the united states. alvarez describes how her parents feared the values of free speech and freedom of association.

Explanation:

In Passage A, it's shown that the author's parents had fear - based thinking due to the dictatorship even in the US. Passage B shows the mother's terror and father's involvement related to the dictatorship situation. The central idea across both is about how the parents' fears from the dictatorship affected their thoughts and actions in the US.

Answer:

Alvarez shows how her parents' fears about the dictatorship affected their thoughts and actions even when they lived in the United States.