Question

ruling
(c) to contrast the advances made in the australian case with the failures of other international cases in holding governments accountable
(d) to give examples of how other countries are taking action to address climate change and to hold governments accountable
which piece of evidence from the article most appeals to the readers sense of morality?
(a) \the future of all young people depends on australia stepping away from fossil fuel projects and taking decisive climate action.\
(b) \there will be further submissions on what the duty of care means for the ministers decision and the mine,\ she said.
(c) in may, a court in the hague ordered royal dutch shell to cut its global carbon emissions by 45 percent by the end of 2030 compared with 2019 levels.
(d) the international energy agency last week suggested there should be no new coal, oil or gas investments if the world was to keep open

Explanation:

The statement in option A appeals to the morality of protecting the future of young people by taking climate - related action. It plays on the sense of responsibility towards the next generation. Options B, C, and D are more about legal orders and energy - agency suggestions rather than directly appealing to morality.

Answer:

A. "The future of all young people depends on Australia stepping away from fossil fuel projects and taking decisive climate action."