Question

1. what were the significant concerns of non - quaker representatives regarding the governance outlined in the frame of 1682? 6. discuss the role of david lloyd and the quakers in the political changes described in the frame of 1696. how did their actions reflect the assemblys desire for power?

Explanation:

To answer these questions, one would need to study the historical context of the Frame of 1682 and 1696, analyze the roles of David Lloyd and the Quakers, and understand the concerns of non - Quaker representatives. Research into historical documents and secondary sources on the political and social environment of the time would be necessary.

Answer:

For question 5: Without specific knowledge of the Frame of 1682, it's difficult to provide a detailed answer. However, non - Quaker representatives likely had concerns about aspects such as power distribution, religious freedom (if they were from different religious groups), and economic and governance policies that might favor the Quakers.
For question 6: David Lloyd and the Quakers' actions in the political changes described in the Frame of 1696 could have reflected the assembly's desire for power through their attempts to shape governance structures, influence policy - making, and ensure that their religious and social values were incorporated into the political system. Their actions might have included lobbying, participating in legislative processes, and forming alliances to gain more political leverage.