Question

which statement best explains the result of a peer - reviewed conclusion?
it is accepted once a scientific journal publishes it.
if peers reject the conclusion, it is probably out of jealously.
if the peers reject the conclusion, it must be retested and changed.
peers will accept the conclusion if it doesnt fit their opinions.

Explanation:

Peer - reviewed conclusions that are rejected by peers need to be re - evaluated. This often involves retesting the data and making necessary changes to the conclusion. Just because a conclusion is published in a scientific journal doesn't mean it's automatically accepted. Rejection is usually based on scientific merit, not jealousy. And peers don't typically accept conclusions that don't fit their opinions.

Answer:

If the peers reject the conclusion, it must be retested and changed.