Question

somewhat confident
not confident
how did this decision affect the protection of free speech? *
9-12.gv.1.cc.e
the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. it does not even p an injunction against uttering words that may have all the effect
—schenck v. united states
speech was limited when the public found it to be obscene.
speech was protected when the truth was offered as a legal de
speech was limited if it posed a danger to public safety.
speech was protected as long as it expressed a personal opini
how confident were you in answering this question? *
very confident
somewhat confident
not confident

Explanation:

The quote from Schenck v. United States establishes that speech that creates a clear, present danger (like shouting "fire" in a theatre to cause panic) is not protected by free speech. This ruling limited free speech when it threatens public safety.

Answer:

Speech was limited if it posed a danger to public safety.