Question

though the outcomes of schenck and new york times differed, what did these decisions have in common?
the government has a heavy burden to prove harm
the government can limit speech that causes harm
the government has unlimited power to limit speech
the government must follow the first amendment

Explanation:

The First - Amendment protects freedom of speech. In both Schenck and New York Times - related decisions, the government's power to limit speech is not absolute and must operate within the bounds of the First - Amendment. The government has a burden to prove harm in order to limit speech, and it does not have unlimited power to do so. The idea that the government can limit speech that causes harm is also related to First - Amendment considerations. Overall, the overarching principle is that the government must follow the First - Amendment.

Answer:

The government must follow the First Amendment