Question

assignment active johnsons argument i understand that this flag has serious important meanings... but that does not mean that... people may not under the first amendment show their feelings by what texas calls desecration of a venerated object. i think its a most important case. i sense that it goes to the heart of the first amendment, to hear things or to see things that we hate test the first amendment more than seeing or hearing things that we like. it wasnt designed for things we like. they never needed a first amendment. —william m. kunstler, attorney for gregory lee johnson, texas v. johnson use the drop - down menu to complete the sentence. in this excerpt, attorney william kunstler is arguing against his clients conviction. the main idea of this excerpt is that the first amendment is essential because it makes flag burning a crime allows for symbolic speech promotes nonviolent actions

Explanation:

The First Amendment protects symbolic speech. Attorney William Kunstler argues that people should be able to express their feelings under it, even if it involves desecration of a venerated object like a flag. This indicates that the First Amendment allows for symbolic speech.

Answer:

allows for symbolic speech