Question

1. is the evidence in the article sufficient to fully support the argument?

• yes, because it includes expert opinions and statistics
• yes, because personal examples are always enough
• no, because it mostly uses examples instead of data
• no, because it doesnt include any claims

Explanation:

To determine the answer, we analyze each option:

• Option 1: The article (from the provided text) doesn't mention expert opinions or statistics, so this is incorrect.
• Option 2: Personal examples are not always sufficient to fully support an argument, and the text doesn't rely on personal examples here, so this is wrong.
• Option 3: The article (about phone use during lunch) seems to use examples (like how phones can benefit students) but lacks data (like research studies, numbers) to fully support the argument, making this a valid reason.
• Option 4: The article does include claims (e.g., phones can benefit students), so this is incorrect.

Answer:

C. No, because it mostly uses examples instead of data