Question

in the federalist 78, alexander hamilton states, \a constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. it therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning.\ which of the following supreme court cases is most relevant to this statement? a baker v. carr (1962) b marbury v. madison (1803) c shaw v. reno (1993) d mcculloch v. maryland (1819)

Explanation:

Hamilton's statement refers to the judicial branch's power to interpret the Constitution (judicial review). Marbury v. Madison established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the authority to determine the meaning and constitutionality of laws, directly aligning with Hamilton's assertion. The other cases address different issues: Baker v. Carr focused on redistricting, Shaw v. Reno on racial gerrymandering, and McCulloch v. Maryland on federal power.

Answer:

B. Marbury v. Madison (1803)