Question

guided practice
read the passage from the crisis.
... but if a thief break into my house, burn and destroy my property, and kill or threaten to kill me, or those that are in it, and to “bind me in all cases whatsoever,” to his absolute will, am i to suffer it?
what signifies it to me, whether he who does it, is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman? whether it is done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case, and pardon in the other...
in this passage, paine is primarily using which persuasive technique?
a. appeal to emotion
b. appeal to logic
c. appeal to ethics
d. appeal to authority

Explanation:

Paine uses a logical, consistent line of reasoning: he draws a parallel between the harm caused by a thief and the harm caused by a ruling power, then questions the double standard of punishing one but tolerating the other. He relies on rational comparison and questioning rather than emotion, ethics, or authority to persuade.

Answer:

B. appeal to logic