Question

michael surveyed the basketball team and found a positive correlation of r = 0.12 between students missing games due to academic probation and spikes in the teams scoring average. he concluded that students with poor grades did not score as many points as those with good grades, and the students with poor grades caused the team to score fewer points while on the court. michael does not have a good argument because the information he used shows a weak positive correlation, which does not imply an association between variables a causation between variables the strength of the relationship

Explanation:

Correlation (r = 0.12) indicates a weak positive relationship between variables. However, correlation does not imply causation. Michael wrongly concluded causation from correlation.

Answer:

Michael made an error in concluding causation between variables just because there was a weak positive correlation. Correlation only shows an association between variables, not a cause - and - effect relationship.