Question

movies based on books are never as good as the original stories. they often change important details or leave out essential parts of the plot. the directors and actors rarely capture the true spirit of the characters and the themes. reading a book is a much more immersive and rewarding experience than watching a movie.
text 2
movies based on books are a great way to introduce new audiences to the world of literature. they can spark interest in the original source material and encourage people to read more. the directors and actors also bring their own creativity and interpretation to the stories; in the same way that authors use prose, filmmakers use visual and audio elements to express the tone and style of the narratives. so while a movie adaptation may stray from its source material, it often offers a fresh and enriching artistic interpretation of the original narrative.
based on the texts, how would the author of text 2 most likely respond to the claims of the author of text 1?
choose 1 answer:
a by arguing that a movie adaptation can still be faithful to the book even if it makes some changes to the plot or the characters
b by explaining that its much harder to make a movie based on a book than to write a book
c by insisting that movies based on books are not meant to duplicate the books but to complement them
d by admitting that most fans of movies based on books dont appreciate the depth and complexity of the books

Explanation:

Text 1 claims movies based on books are never as good as the original stories due to changes and lack of capturing the spirit. Text 2 emphasizes that movie - adaptations can introduce new audiences, spark interest, and offer a fresh artistic interpretation. It implies that movies are not meant to be exact copies but complementary to the books.

Answer:

C. By insisting that movies based on books are not meant to duplicate the books but to complement them