Question

8 0/1 point what does this analogy mean? \car companies sensibly use a network to organize their hundreds of suppliers, but not to design their cars. no one believes that the articulation of a coherent design philosophy is best handled by a sprawling, leaderless organizational system. because networks dont have a centralized leadership structure and clear lines of authority, they have real difficulty reaching consensus and setting goals. they cant think strategically; they are chronically prone to conflict and error. how do you make difficult choices about tactics or strategy or philosophical direction when everyone has an equal say?\ although unstructured networks work in some situations, in some cases leadership is necessary. if car companies made it so all workers were on an equal ground, they would be more successful and create better cars. people make better choices when they group together with loved ones and everyone has an equal vote in the matter. strategy is more important than having people to join the cause.

Explanation:

The text argues that networks (leader - less structures) are good for organizing suppliers but not for design where a clear leadership and consensus - building are needed. It implies that in some cases, leadership is essential as networks have limitations in strategic thinking and decision - making.

Answer:

A. Although unstructured networks work in some situations, in some cases leadership is necessary.