Question

question 9 of 10
a scientific paper that has passed through the peer - review process is more respected than one that has not. why might a scientist value a peer - reviewed paper?
a. the described experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science.
b. the analysis of the experimental results is guaranteed to be entertaining.
c. the scientist who wrote the paper is likely to become a famous person.
d. the described materials are expected to become a good investment.

Explanation:

Peer - review in science ensures that experiments and research meet or exceed the standards of good science. It is a quality - control mechanism in the scientific community. Options B, C, and D are not the main reasons for the value of peer - reviewed papers.

Answer:

A. The described experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science.