QUESTION IMAGE
Question
question 17 (1 point) using the chart below about the 1790 population census data to answer the following question. which state would have received the least political benefit from the 3/5ths compromise? 1790 population data from the us census state total population number of enslaved persons massachusetts 379,797 0 new - jersey 184,139 1,657 new york 340,120 10,000 virginia 747,610 425,353 no answer provided a. virginia b. massachusetts c. new york d. new jersey question 18 (1 point) the treaty of paris of 1783 no answer provided a. added the territory around the great lakes to the united states. b. confined the united states to territories held by the colonies before the war. c. ceded (gave) far more territory to the united states than the colonies had won in the war. d. gave all british territories west of the appalachian mountains to france. question 19 (1 point) in gibbons v. ogden, john marshall ruled that no answer provided a. new york could issue ogdens monopoly because of their reserved power to regulate and establish trade with other states. b. regulating interstate trade is a specific power given to the judiciary for enforcement. c. new york and the us could both regulate interstate trade so ogdens monopoly was valid. d. regulating interstate commerce is a power reserved to the federal government.
Question 17:
The 3/5ths compromise counted 3 out of every 5 enslaved persons as part of the population for purposes of apportioning representatives and direct taxes. States with fewer enslaved persons would benefit less politically as they would have fewer additional "counted" individuals for representation. Massachusetts had 0 enslaved persons, so it would receive the least political benefit from the 3/5ths compromise.
Question 18:
The Treaty of Paris of 1783 ceded far more territory to the United States than the colonies had won in the war. It granted the U.S. control of a vast area from the Atlantic to the Mississippi River, including lands previously held by the British.
Question 19:
In Gibbons v. Ogden, John Marshall ruled that regulating interstate commerce is a power reserved to the federal government. This decision strengthened the power of the federal government over interstate trade matters.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations