Question

read the excerpt from \for the era.\as of early 1970 most states would have some laws that would be affected. however, changes are being made so rapidly as a result of title vii of the civil rights act of 1964, it is likely that by the time the equal rights amendment would become effective, no conflicting state laws would remain.read frankies paraphrase.changes in state laws are happening so quickly, that, despite there being an abundance of laws discriminating against women now, there wont be any once the era and the civil rights act of 1964 go into effect.what paraphrasing mistake has frankie made?misrepresented the original meaningadded a personal opinionmade the paraphrase too shortmatched the original wording too closely

Explanation:

The original text states that changes from Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act are making state laws change rapidly, so likely no conflicting laws will remain when the ERA takes effect. Frankie's paraphrase incorrectly claims there are currently "an abundance of laws discriminating against women" (the original only says some state laws would be affected, not specifying discrimination) and says there "won't be any" conflicting laws (the original uses the tentative "it is likely"), altering the original meaning.

Answer:

misrepresented the original meaning