QUESTION IMAGE
Question
read the statement on the right and select the dri guideline on the left that fits with the statement. you may use a dri recommendation more than once. if the entire class ate the ______ for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need cdrr dropdown about half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the ____ rda dropdown there may be negative consequences if people consume more than the ____. ul dropdown the __ tells us the maximum amount we should consume before our risk of chronic disease increases ai dropdown this guideline is set when we dont have enough information to set the rda choose dropdown the rda is set using the ____. choose dropdown the only nutrient that currently has a ______ is sodium. choose dropdown
To solve this, we analyze each statement with DRI (Dietary Reference Intakes) definitions:
1. "If the entire class ate the ______ for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need"
- RDA (Recommended Dietary Allowance): Meets needs of ~97 - 98% of the population. If a group eats at RDA, most (97%) get enough (or more). Wait, no—wait, the statement says "more than they need". Wait, correction: AI (Adequate Intake)? No, recheck:
Wait, the first statement: "about 97% would get more than they need"—actually, RDA is for meeting needs of 97 - 98% of the population. Wait, maybe I mixed up. Let's recall DRI components:
- RDA: Meets the needs of 97–98% of healthy people in a group. So if a group eats at RDA, ~97% get enough (or more). But the statement says "more than they need"—maybe a typo, but let's proceed.
Wait, no—let's list all DRI terms:
- RDA: Recommended Dietary Allowance – meets needs of 97–98% of the population.
- AI (Adequate Intake): Used when RDA can’t be set (insufficient data); meets needs of healthy people.
- UL (Tolerable Upper Intake Level): Maximum daily intake without adverse effects.
- CDRR (Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake): Reduces chronic disease risk.
1. "If the entire class ate the ______ for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need"
- Correct: RDA (since RDA is set to meet 97–98% of the population’s needs; so if everyone eats RDA, ~97% get enough (or more than they need, as their individual needs are below RDA).
2. "About half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the ______"
- If a group consumes a level that leaves half without enough, this is AI? No—wait, RDA is for 97% adequacy. If a level is set such that only 50% get enough, that’s not RDA. Wait, maybe the statement is reversed. Wait, no—let's re-express: If a group consumes X, half don’t get enough. So X is too low. Wait, maybe the intended answer is AI? No, this is confusing. Wait, let's check standard DRI matching:
Wait, the second statement: "About half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the ______"—this is likely a misstatement, but the correct match is AI? No, let's check the third statement.
3. "There may be negative consequences if people consume more than the ______"
- UL (Tolerable Upper Intake Level): Exceeding UL increases risk of adverse effects. So this matches UL.
4. "The ______ tells us the maximum amount we should consume before our risk of chronic disease increases"
- CDRR (Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake): Focuses on reducing chronic disease risk (e.g., sodium, saturated fat). So this matches CDRR.
5. "This guideline is set when we don’t have enough information to set the RDA"
- AI (Adequate Intake): Used when RDA can’t be established (insufficient data). So this matches AI.
6. "The RDA is set using the ______"
- RDA is derived from the EAR (Estimated Average Requirement), but EAR isn’t an option here. Wait, the options are CDRR, RDA, UL, AI. Wait, maybe the intended answer is EAR? No, the options given are the ones in the dropdowns. Wait, maybe a mistake, but assuming the options include EAR (but in the image, the dropdowns have CDRR, RDA, UL, AI, and [Choose] for others). Wait, maybe the sixth statement: "The RDA is set using the ______"—RDA is set as EAR + 2 standard deviations (to cover 97–98% of the population). But if EAR isn’t an option, maybe the intended answer is EAR (not listed), but this is confusing. Alternatively, maybe a typo, and the answer is EAR…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
To solve this, we analyze each statement with DRI (Dietary Reference Intakes) definitions:
1. "If the entire class ate the ______ for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need"
- RDA (Recommended Dietary Allowance): Meets needs of ~97 - 98% of the population. If a group eats at RDA, most (97%) get enough (or more). Wait, no—wait, the statement says "more than they need". Wait, correction: AI (Adequate Intake)? No, recheck:
Wait, the first statement: "about 97% would get more than they need"—actually, RDA is for meeting needs of 97 - 98% of the population. Wait, maybe I mixed up. Let's recall DRI components:
- RDA: Meets the needs of 97–98% of healthy people in a group. So if a group eats at RDA, ~97% get enough (or more). But the statement says "more than they need"—maybe a typo, but let's proceed.
Wait, no—let's list all DRI terms:
- RDA: Recommended Dietary Allowance – meets needs of 97–98% of the population.
- AI (Adequate Intake): Used when RDA can’t be set (insufficient data); meets needs of healthy people.
- UL (Tolerable Upper Intake Level): Maximum daily intake without adverse effects.
- CDRR (Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake): Reduces chronic disease risk.
1. "If the entire class ate the ______ for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need"
- Correct: RDA (since RDA is set to meet 97–98% of the population’s needs; so if everyone eats RDA, ~97% get enough (or more than they need, as their individual needs are below RDA).
2. "About half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the ______"
- If a group consumes a level that leaves half without enough, this is AI? No—wait, RDA is for 97% adequacy. If a level is set such that only 50% get enough, that’s not RDA. Wait, maybe the statement is reversed. Wait, no—let's re-express: If a group consumes X, half don’t get enough. So X is too low. Wait, maybe the intended answer is AI? No, this is confusing. Wait, let's check standard DRI matching:
Wait, the second statement: "About half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the ______"—this is likely a misstatement, but the correct match is AI? No, let's check the third statement.
3. "There may be negative consequences if people consume more than the ______"
- UL (Tolerable Upper Intake Level): Exceeding UL increases risk of adverse effects. So this matches UL.
4. "The ______ tells us the maximum amount we should consume before our risk of chronic disease increases"
- CDRR (Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake): Focuses on reducing chronic disease risk (e.g., sodium, saturated fat). So this matches CDRR.
5. "This guideline is set when we don’t have enough information to set the RDA"
- AI (Adequate Intake): Used when RDA can’t be established (insufficient data). So this matches AI.
6. "The RDA is set using the ______"
- RDA is derived from the EAR (Estimated Average Requirement), but EAR isn’t an option here. Wait, the options are CDRR, RDA, UL, AI. Wait, maybe the intended answer is EAR? No, the options given are the ones in the dropdowns. Wait, maybe a mistake, but assuming the options include EAR (but in the image, the dropdowns have CDRR, RDA, UL, AI, and [Choose] for others). Wait, maybe the sixth statement: "The RDA is set using the ______"—RDA is set as EAR + 2 standard deviations (to cover 97–98% of the population). But if EAR isn’t an option, maybe the intended answer is EAR (not listed), but this is confusing. Alternatively, maybe a typo, and the answer is EAR (but not in options).
7. "The only nutrient that currently has a ______ is sodium"
- CDRR (Chronic Disease Risk Reduction Intake): Sodium has a CDRR (to reduce hypertension risk). So this matches CDRR.
Now, let's correct the initial matches with accurate DRI definitions:
- "If the entire class ate the ______ for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need" → RDA (RDA meets 97–98% of needs; so ~97% get enough/more).
- "About half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the ______" → EAR (Estimated Average Requirement) – meets 50% of the population’s needs. But EAR isn’t an option. Wait, the options given are CDRR, RDA, UL, AI. Maybe the statement is reversed: "About half will get enough" → EAR. But since EAR isn’t an option, maybe the intended answer is AI (incorrect, but given the options, perhaps a mistake).
- "There may be negative consequences if people consume more than the ______" → UL (correct).
- "The ______ tells us the maximum amount we should consume before our risk of chronic disease increases" → CDRR (correct, as CDRR is for chronic disease risk reduction).
- "This guideline is set when we don’t have enough information to set the RDA" → AI (correct).
- "The RDA is set using the ______" → EAR (not in options, but if forced, maybe "EAR" is implied, but since it’s not listed, this is an error).
- "The only nutrient that currently has a ______ is sodium" → CDRR (correct, as sodium has a CDRR for chronic disease risk reduction).
Final Matches (correcting based on DRI definitions):
- Dropdown: RDA
- Dropdown: EAR (not listed, but if options include EAR, else maybe a mistake)
- Dropdown: UL
- Dropdown: CDRR
- Dropdown: AI
- Dropdown: EAR (not listed)
- Dropdown: CDRR
But since the options given in the dropdowns are CDRR, RDA, UL, AI, and [Choose] (implying EAR or other), we proceed with the most accurate matches:
- "If the entire class ate the ______ for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need" → RDA
- "About half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the ______" → EAR (not in options, but if we assume a typo, maybe "AI" is incorrect; this is a flaw in the question)
- "There may be negative consequences if people consume more than the ______" → UL
- "The ______ tells us the maximum amount we should consume before our risk of chronic disease increases" → CDRR
- "This guideline is set when we don’t have enough information to set the RDA" → AI
- "The RDA is set using the ______" → EAR (not in options, but if we must choose from given, maybe "AI" is wrong; this is an error)
- "The only nutrient that currently has a ______ is sodium" → CDRR
Final Answers (matching each statement to the dropdown):
- RDA
- (If EAR is not an option, this is a mistake; but assuming the question expects "AI" incorrectly, or "EAR" is implied)
- UL
- CDRR
- AI
- (EAR, not in options)
- CDRR
Since the question is about DRI matching, the correct dropdown selections (based on standard DRI definitions) are:
- RDA
- (EAR, but if not available, maybe a typo)
- UL
- CDRR
- AI
- (EAR)
- CDRR
For the purpose of answering, we list the correct matches:
- If the entire class ate the RDA for a nutrient, about 97% would get more than they need.
- About half of a given population will not get enough if they consume the EAR (not in options, but if forced, maybe a mistake).
- There may be negative consequences if people consume more than the UL.
- The CDRR tells us the maximum amount we should consume before our risk of chronic disease increases.
- This guideline is set when we don’t have enough information to set the RDA: AI.
- The RDA is set using the EAR (not in options).
- The only nutrient that currently has a CDRR is sodium.
Final Answer (for each dropdown, in order):
- RDA
- (EAR, but if options include it; else, the question has an error)
- UL
- CDRR
- AI
- (EAR)
- CDRR
(Note: The question may have a typo or missing options, but the above is the accurate DRI-based matching.)