Question

from safety and efficiency aside, many are not on - board with the idea. for instance, a 2017 deloitte study concluded that seventy - five percent of americans do not support the idea of autonomous vehicles. this can only stem from ignorance. considering the ways in which self - driving cars are superior to human drivers - from their thorough safety to their advanced traffic management - anyone who rejects self - driving cars must be expressing a simple fear of change. there was a time, when people could barely imagine hurtling through the sky in a metal tube. yet, today, air travel is barely given a second thought. consider the eventual acceptance of driverless cars as a mainstream form of transportation. the sixth paragraph is meant to support the authors main claim that self - driving cars will make driving far better. whats wrong with the authors argument in the sixth paragraph? the author admits that having autonomous cars on the road is a bad idea. the author fails to provide evidence that many people are opposed to the idea of autonomous vehicles. the author does not give statistics that compare airplane and car crashes.

Explanation:

The author argues that opposition to self - driving cars is just fear of change, comparing it to past resistance to air travel. But this is a weak analogy as there's no evidence that the reasons for opposing self - driving cars are the same as those for past transportation changes. Also, the comparison to air travel doesn't directly address the concerns about self - driving cars.

Answer:

The author makes a weak analogy between opposition to self - driving cars and past opposition to air travel without proper evidence to support the similarity of reasons for opposition.