QUESTION IMAGE
Question
sort the words according to the meanings of their shared roots.
intersect transfer propel bisect
prognosticate proceed projection intransigent
cut across before; forward
Brief Explanations
- For the "cut" category:
- "intersect" has the root "sect" (meaning cut), as it means to cut across.
- "bisect" has "sect" (to cut into two parts).
- "intransigent" has "trans" (across) and "ig" (to drive), but wait, no—wait, "intransigent" actually has roots related to not moving, but maybe I made a mistake. Wait, no, let's re - evaluate. The correct words for "cut" are "intersect" (inter - between, sect - cut: cut between), "bisect" (bi - two, sect - cut: cut into two), and actually, "intransigent" is not related to cut. I must have made an error. Let's re - analyze each word:
- "intersect": "inter" (between) + "sect" (cut) → cut between.
- "bisect": "bi" (two) + "sect" (cut) → cut into two.
- The third word for "cut" should be... Wait, maybe I missed. Let's check the other words. "transfer": "trans" (across) + "fer" (carry) → carry across. "propel": "pro" (forward) + "pel" (drive) → drive forward. "prognosticate": "pro" (before) + "gnost" (know) → know before (predict). "proceed": "pro" (forward) + "ceed" (go) → go forward. "projection": "pro" (forward) + "ject" (throw) → throw forward. So for "cut": intersect, bisect, and is there another? Wait, maybe the original problem has a typo or my analysis is wrong. Wait, the words are intersect, transfer, propel, bisect, prognosticate, proceed, projection, intransigent. So for "cut": intersect (sect - cut), bisect (sect - cut), and maybe intransigent is not. Wait, maybe the third word is not there, but according to the problem, we have to sort. So "cut": intersect, bisect. Wait, no, maybe I made a mistake. Let's check the roots again:
- "intersect": root "sect" (cut)
- "bisect": root "sect" (cut)
- "intransigent": root "trans" (across) and "ig" (to drive), no. So maybe the "cut" group is intersect, bisect.
- For "across":
- "transfer": "trans" (across) + "fer" (carry) → carry across.
- "intersect": "inter" (between) + "sect" (cut) → cut across (so it can also be in "across"? Wait, maybe my initial analysis was wrong. Let's re - categorize:
- "transfer": "trans" (across) + "fer" (carry) → across group.
- "intersect": "inter" (between) + "sect" (cut) → but "inter" can also mean across? Wait, "inter" means between, but "trans" means across. So "transfer" (trans - across), "intersect" (inter - between, but the action is cutting across), maybe "intersect" can be in both? No, the problem says "according to the meanings of their shared roots". Let's use the root meanings:
- "trans" means across: transfer (trans - across + fer - carry), intersect (inter - between + sect - cut, but the "across" idea is there as it's cutting across), and intransigent: "in" (not) + "trans" (across) + "ig" (to drive) → not moving across (stubborn). So "across": transfer, intersect, intransigent.
- For "before; forward":
- "propel": "pro" (forward) + "pel" (drive) → drive forward.
- "prognosticate": "pro" (before) + "gnost" (know) → know before (predict).
- "proceed": "pro" (forward) + "ceed" (go) → go forward.
- "projection": "pro" (forward) + "ject" (throw) → throw forward.
- Correct categorization:
- "cut": intersect, bisect (both have "sect" root meaning cut)
- "across": transfer, intersect, intransigent (transfer: trans - across; intersect: cut across; intransigent: not moving across)
- "before; forward": propel, prognosticate, proceed, projection (pro - before/forward)
But let's do it properly:
- Cut: intersect (sect - cut), bisect (sect - cut)
- Across: transfer (tra…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
- cut: intersect, bisect
- across: transfer, intransigent
- before; forward: propel, prognosticate, proceed, projection