Question

in water flowing from toilet to tap may be hard to swallow, what reasons does schwartz give to support his claim?
select two options.
□ \water recycling is common for uses like irrigation; purple pipes in many california towns deliver water to golf courses, zoos and farms.\
□ \enticing people to drink recycled water, however, requires getting past what experts call the yuck factor.\
□ \in november, the san diego city council voted for a $2.9 billion pure water program to provide a third of the citys daily needs by 2035.\
□ \the processes . . . that clean the water include microfiltration that strains out anything larger than 0.2 microns, removing almost all suspended solids, bacteria and protozoa.\
□ \people tend to judge risk emotionally, he said, and a phrase like toilet to tap can undercut earnest explanations.\

Explanation:

The question asks for two options that support Schwartz's claim that toilet-to-tap water recycling is hard to accept. The relevant options address the emotional/psychological barrier (the "yuck factor") and how negative framing undermines support for the practice.

Answer:

• "Enticing people to drink recycled water, however, requires getting past what experts call the 'yuck factor.'"
• "People tend to judge risk emotionally, he said, and a phrase like 'toilet to tap' can undercut earnest explanations."