Question

which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be changed to 18?
some 16 - year - olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them.
some 16 - year - olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone.
changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.
changing the minimum driving age to 18 shouldnt cause too much of a problem, because its only two years older than 16.

Explanation:

The most effective claim for raising the minimum driving - age to 18 should focus on a broad benefit. The first option is against the change. The second option is weak as it starts by acknowledging 16 - year - olds' maturity. The fourth option has a weak reasoning. The third option provides a strong reason related to public safety, which is a significant factor in policy - making.

Answer:

Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.