QUESTION IMAGE
Question
select the correct answer. what is the empirical formula for ribose (c₅h₁₀o₅)? ch₁₀o c₀.₅ho₀.₅ ch₂o c₅h₂o₅ c₅h₁₀o₅
Step1: Recall empirical formula definition
The empirical formula is the simplest whole - number ratio of atoms in a compound. For a compound with formula \(C_xH_yO_z\), we find the greatest common divisor (GCD) of \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\) and divide each subscript by it.
For ribose, the molecular formula is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\).
Step2: Find GCD of subscripts
The subscripts are \(x = 5\), \(y=10\), \(z = 5\). The GCD of 5, 10, and 5 is 5.
Step3: Divide each subscript by GCD
Divide the subscript of \(C\): \(\frac{5}{5}=1\)
Divide the subscript of \(H\): \(\frac{10}{5} = 2\)
Divide the subscript of \(O\): \(\frac{5}{5}=1\)
So the empirical formula is \(CH_2O\)? Wait, no, wait. Wait the molecular formula is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\). Let's recalculate. Wait, 5,10,5. The GCD of 5,10,5 is 5. So dividing each by 5: C: 5/5 =1, H:10/5 =2, O:5/5 =1? Wait no, wait the option \(CH_2O\) or \(C_5H_2O_5\)? Wait no, wait the molecular formula is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\). Let's check the options. Wait the options are \(CH_{10}O\), \(C_{0.5}HO_{0.5}\), \(CH_2O\), \(C_5H_2O_5\), \(C_5H_{10}O_5\). Wait, no, wait the correct way: empirical formula is the simplest whole - number ratio. So for \(C_5H_{10}O_5\), we divide each subscript by 5. So C: 5/5 =1, H:10/5 =2, O:5/5 =1? But that would be \(CH_2O\), but wait, no, wait the molecular formula of ribose is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\), and its empirical formula is \(CH_2O\)? Wait no, wait no, wait the empirical formula of ribose ( \(C_5H_{10}O_5\)): the ratio of C:H:O is 5:10:5, which simplifies to 1:2:1. But wait, the option \(CH_2O\) has C:H:O = 1:2:1? Wait no, \(CH_2O\) is C:1, H:2, O:1. But wait, the molecular formula is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\), so when we divide by 5, we get \(CH_2O\)? But wait, the option \(C_5H_2O_5\) is wrong, \(CH_{10}O\) is wrong, \(C_{0.5}HO_{0.5}\) has fractions, which is not allowed in empirical formula (empirical formula should have whole numbers). The molecular formula is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\), so the empirical formula is obtained by dividing each subscript by the greatest common divisor of 5,10,5, which is 5. So C: 5/5 =1, H:10/5 =2, O:5/5 =1? Wait no, that would be \(CH_2O\), but wait, no, wait the correct empirical formula for ribose (\(C_5H_{10}O_5\)) is \(CH_2O\)? Wait no, wait no, I made a mistake. Wait the molecular formula of ribose is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\), and the empirical formula is the simplest whole - number ratio. So 5,10,5. The GCD is 5. So 5÷5 =1, 10÷5 =2, 5÷5 =1. So the empirical formula is \(CH_2O\)? But wait, the option \(CH_2O\) is there. But wait, another way: wait the molecular formula is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\), so the ratio of C:H:O is 5:10:5, which can be simplified by dividing each by 5, giving 1:2:1. So the empirical formula is \(CH_2O\). But wait, the option \(C_5H_2O_5\) is wrong, \(CH_{10}O\) is wrong, \(C_{0.5}HO_{0.5}\) is invalid (non - whole numbers), \(C_5H_{10}O_5\) is the molecular formula, not empirical. So the correct empirical formula is \(CH_2O\)? Wait no, wait no, I think I messed up. Wait ribose has molecular formula \(C_5H_{10}O_5\), and its empirical formula is \(CH_2O\)? Wait no, wait the empirical formula of ribose is actually \(CH_2O\)? Wait no, wait no, let's check again. The molecular formula is \(C_5H_{10}O_5\). The greatest common divisor of 5,10,5 is 5. So dividing each subscript by 5: C: 5/5 =1, H:10/5 =2, O:5/5 =1. So the empirical formula is \(CH_2O\). But wait, the option \(CH_2O\) is present. Wait but another option is \(C_5H_2O_5\) which is wrong, \(CH_{10}O\) is wrong, \(C_{0.5}HO_{0.5}\) is invalid, \(C_5H_{10}O_5\) is molecular. So the correct answer is…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
\(CH_2O\) (the option with formula \(CH_2O\))